LATEST NEWS:

The F1 Grand Prix of Hometown Tragedy and the Mercedes Comeback

With the Formula 1 season back in action for its 2026 season under new regulations, we have seen Melbourne's hometown hero, Oscar Piastri, fail to make it to the starting grid, and Mercedes and Ferrar

The 2025 F1 Triple Title Fight Riddled with Controversy

With the 2025 Formula One season coming to a close, the final stretch of the season is shaping up to be a tense three-way contention to decide the drivers' championship. What was initially a display o

Article

The Courage of Vulnerability with CHARLY OAKLEY

At 22, Charly Oakley is carving out an artistic identity built on a tension they have come to embrace rather than resolve. Strength and vulnerability sit side by side in their work and in the way they move through the world.

featuredHomefodderreviews

At 22, Charly Oakley is carving out an artistic identity built on a tension they have come to embrace rather than resolve. Strength and vulnerability sit side by side in their work and in the way they move through the world.

When asked how those forces have shaped them, Oakley pauses before answering, choosing their words carefully. “I think they’ve created a backbone and a softness in me at the same time,” they say. “I feel like I can really hold my own, say what I want to say with conviction and earnestness.”

It’s an interesting framework. Vulnerability is often framed as something delicate, something that needs protection from the harsher edges of public life. Oakley instead describes strength as the structure that allows vulnerability to exist in the first place. “Strength is the container for my fluidity and my creativity to live in,” they explain. “I’ve always got that soft place to land inside myself, but it has this infrastructure of conviction around it.”

There is something quietly radical in that idea, particularly within pop music. For decades, the genre has oscillated between glossy escapism and confessional oversharing, often flattening emotional nuance in the process. Oakley’s approach feels different, because it manages to retain that nuance.

Oakley has carried this for most of their life. They speak openly about growing up deeply sensitive and intuitive, who constantly absorbs the emotional currents around them. For a long time, they believed that sensitivity might eventually fade. “For so much of my life I felt that my sensitivity and my joy were naïve,” they say. “Like it was a kind of illusion that would slowly fade away and that I’d be jaded by what adult life is really like.”

The expectation that adulthood requires emotional hardening is a familiar one. It’s built into cultural narratives about maturity, resilience and success. What Oakley describes instead is a quiet refusal to let that hardening fully take hold. “Being authentic and leading with your heart on your sleeve is actually not a soft thing to do,” they say. “It’s really hard.” The contradiction is central to their philosophy. “The cost of living in your softness is to fight really hard for it.”

For Oakley, pop itself represents possibility. They speak about it less as a fixed genre and more as a flexible space where ideas can expand.“At its core, pop is a space for freedom,” they say. “It lets me evolve and experiment without constraints.”

Openness shapes their songwriting, which moves fluidly between personal reflection and broader philosophical questions. Rather than offering tidy emotional conclusions, Oakley explores the messy spaces where certainty dissolves. Songs revolve around community, resilience, and connection, especially at a time when many people feel increasingly isolated.

These ideas come alive on Oakley’s debut single Against the Odds. The track examines friendship and solidarity as methods of emotional survival. It was produced alongside Los Angeles producer Xandy Barry and Oakley’s long-time collaborator and friend Jordie Tomas, translating openness in their artistic philosophy directly into sound.

The song itself was written in an unusually intimate way. Instead of drawing from memory or abstraction, Oakley found themselves writing while sitting across from the person who inspired it. “It was really cool to be writing about someone and actually looking at them,” they say. “It was the closest thing I’ve felt to being a painter and painting the subject in front of you.”

Oakley describes their friendship as a kind of chosen family, particularly during their twenties. “There’s this period where your friends kind of replace your family,” they say. “I feel like I’m not going crazy when I look around at my friends.”

It’s a sentiment that resonates within a broader cultural moment where loneliness is frequently described as a public health crisis. Oakley seems acutely aware of that reality, often returning to the idea that the modern world has convinced people they are isolated from one another.

“One of our greatest tragedies is the illusion that we are alone,” they say. “We’re just not.” Music, for Oakley, becomes one of the places where that illusion briefly dissolves.

They speak with particular fascination about the emotional atmosphere of live performance. One piece of research has stuck with them. “One of my favourite nerdy scientific facts,” Oakley says, smiling, “is that they did an experiment on people watching live music and theatre, and all of their heart rates went to the exact same.”

By the end of the performance, the audience’s bodies had synchronised. Their heartbeats were literally beating together. “There are physiological indicators that we’re actually in a space where we’re open and ready to share and be there for each other,” Oakley says.

In a world where social connection is increasingly mediated through screens, the simple act of standing in a room with strangers and feeling something, begins to take on a deeper significance.

Oakley experiences that phenomenon from a unique vantage point. From the stage, they watch the subtle emotional shifts that unfold across a crowd. “I really do watch,” they say. “I watch people enter a space and I see them slowly thaw out into who they want to be.”

Someone might arrive guarded, arms folded, standing still near the back of the room. By the end of the night they are dancing, singing and expressing themselves without hesitation.

“To see someone come in with their arms crossed and at the end just be dancing and singing and expressing themselves… that’s one of the greatest gifts in the entire world.”

After one of their headline shows, Oakley invited audience members to share anonymous reflections about the experience. One response stayed with them.“Someone said it was the first time they didn’t judge themselves,” Oakley recalls. “They said they felt like a kid again.”

It reveals something important about the relationship between artist and audience. Performers offer something emotionally vulnerable, and audiences respond with their own openness.

“I have such a privilege standing on stage,” Oakley says. “I get the best view for the entire evening.”

The same approach carries into Oakley’s songwriting. Rather than searching for  conclusions, they are drawn to questions that resist resolution, exploring spaces where feelings remain unresolved and complex. “I really enjoy writing songs about things that feel inexplicable,” they say. “I’m not really interested in writing songs about answers. I’m interested in writing songs with questions."

In many ways that philosophy mirrors the broader contradictions that Oakley is interested in exploring. Joy and grief, connection and loneliness, resilience and vulnerability all appear simultaneously in their work.

This willingness to sit with contradiction has gradually shaped not just their art, but  their relationship to their voice. In recent years, Oakley has also begun thinking more critically about the role they play as an artist within that collective experience. A few years ago they realised they didn’t need to wait for a larger platform before being transparent about what they believe in.

“I realised I don’t have to wait to have a platform for people to know who I am and what I value,” they say.

The permission, it turned out, had always been theirs to give. “My point is resistance,” Oakley explains. “Where I direct people’s attention is advocacy, even if I’m playing to a room of a hundred people.”

At one of their recent shows, Oakley chose to raise money for mental health initiatives instead of selling merchandise. The gesture was small in scale but symbolic of a larger mindset.

Oakley is careful to frame that responsibility with humility. “I’m not going to get it right every time,” they admit. “I can’t solve everything.” But the intention remains clear. Creating spaces where people feel connected, even briefly, feels worthwhile.

“If I can provide space and time and energy for people,” Oakley says, “that’s what I’m trying to do.”

Looking ahead to 2026, Oakley hopes to expand both their sound and the ideas embedded within it. “‘Against the Odds’ is the first peek into the next chapter,” they say. “It’s the beginning of a sonic undertaking of what it is to be human.”

Listening to Oakley speak, it becomes clear that this undertaking begins with a simple premise. In a time when many people feel increasingly fragmented from one another, art can still create moments of shared feeling.

Against the odds, Oakley seems determined to protect that possibility.

Farrago's magazine cover - Edition One 2025

EDITION TWO 2025 AVAILABLE NOW!

Read online